نوع مقاله : علمی ـ پژوهشی
نویسنده
استادیار دانشگاه تهران، پردیس فارابی
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسنده [English]
The Paradox of Confirmation is a result of two principles: first, Nicod's principle or criterion; second, the equivalence principle or condition. Thus solutions proposed for the paradox are of two types: first, the ones based on rejecting Nicod's principle, and second, the ones based on the rejection of equivalence condition. In the present paper, I will review the Paradox of Confirmation and four solutions to it, two of which are based on the rejection of the equivalence condition. The third (Lipton's) is, in my view, based on the rejection of Nicod's principle, and the fourth is somehow derived from issues in modern logic and is focused on the existential content of the subject-matter of two theorems of the principle and its contraposition. Finally I propose my own assessment in which the logical aspect of the problem is distinguished from the psychological one, and within the logical aspect, positive and negative aspects are separated.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
1. Beaney, Michael (1999(, “Presuppositions and the Paradoxes of Confirmation” URL: http://www.disputatio.com/wp-content/uploads/1999/05/006-3.
2. Earman, John (1992), Bayes or Bust? A Critical Examination of Bayesian Confirmation Theory, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
3. Eells, E. (1982), Rational Decision and Causality, New York: Cambridge University Press.
4. Gibson, L. (1969), “On Ravens and Relevance and a Likelihood Solution of the Paradox of Confirmation,” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science,
Vol. 20, No. 1.
5. Fraassen, Bas C. Van (1980), The Scientific Image, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
6. Godfrey, Peter (2003), Theory and Reality, an Introduction to the Philosophy of Science, The University of Chicago Press.
7. Good, I. J. (1967), “The White Shoe is a Red Herring,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 17, No. 4.
8. ـــــــــــــ (1983), Good Thinking The Foundations of Probability and Its Applications, U.S.A: The University of Minnesota.
9. Hempel, Carl G. (1967), “The White Shoe - No Red Herring,” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 18, No. 3.
10. ـــــــــــــ (1970), “Studies in the Logic of Confirmation,” Aspects of Scientific Explanation and other Essays in the Philosophy of Science, New York: The Free Press.
11. ـــــــــــــ (1945), “Studies in Logic and Confirmation,” Mind 54.
12. Howson, Urbach (1993), Scientific Reasoning: The Bayesian Approach, Open Court Publishing Company.
13. Humburg, J. (1986), The solution of Hempel's Raven paradox in Rudolf Carnap's System of Inductive logic, Erkenntnis, Vol. 24, No. 1.
14. Lipton, Peter (2004), Inference to the Best Explanation, London, second edition.
17. Nicod, Jean (1930), Foundations of Geometry and Induction, translated by Philip Winner, New York: Harcourt, Brace, and Company.
18. Peter Godfrey (2003), Theory and Reality, an Introduction to the Philosophy of Science, The University of Chicago Press.
19. Quine, W.V. (1969), “Natural Kinds,” Ontological Relativity and other Essays, New York: Columbia university Press.
20. Sornsen, Roy (2003), A Brief History of the Paradox, Oxford University Press.
21. Stathis Psillos (2009), Knowing the Structure of Nature, Essays on Realism and Explanation, Palgrave Macmillan.
22. Swinburne, R. G. (1971), “The paradoxes of Confirmation - A Survey,” American Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 8, no. 4.
23. لاریجانی، صادق (1367)، «نقدی بر مقاله قبض و بسط تئوریک شریعت»، کیهان فرهنگی، سال 5، ش 7.
24. نیری، حمید (1367)، «قبض اندیشه و ادعای خلوص»، کیهان فرهنگی، سال 5، ش 9.
25. وحید دستجردی، حمید (1374)، «بازآموزی پارادوکس تأیید، فکر دینی و جدال با مدعی»، در: سروش، عبدالکریم (1374)، قبض و بسط تئوریک شریعت، نظریه تکامل معرفت دینی، تهران: صراط.
26. نصیری، منصور (1391الف)، «بررسی دیدگاه عمل‌گرایانه ون‌فراسن در تبیین و تطبیق آن با عمل‌گرایی سنتی»، روش‌شناسی علوم انسانی، سال 18، ش 72.
27. ________ (1391ب)، «پارادوکس تأیید، بررسی راه‌حل‌های مبتنی بر رد معیار نیکو»، نقد و نظر، سال 17، ش 68.
28. همپل، کارل (1380)، فلسفه علوم طبیعی، ترجمه: حسین معصومی همدانی، تهران: مرکز نشر دانشگاهی، چاپ دوم.
)