نوع مقاله : علمی ـ پژوهشی
نویسنده
علوم پزشکی دزفول
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسنده [English]
The relationship between the principles of free will and causality has long been a subject of questioning and exploration by thinkers and philosophers in both the East and the West.
In their analysis of the two fundamental principles of free will and causality, Western philosophers have taken two directions. One branch believes in the compatibility between these two principles, while the other branch believes that free will and causality are incompatible with each other.
Incompatibilists have also split into two, some choosing the side of free will and another branch turning to determinism. Free will advocates have presented arguments such as the idea of "causality-agent" by Roderick Chesom, the theory of "self-determination" by Robert Keene, and the "Uncertainty Principle" by Heisenberg. In contrast, deterministic incompatibilists have relied on arguments such as Peter van en Wegen's "consequential argument", Benjamin Libet's "unconscious brain process" experiment, and Nichols' "common sense challenge" experiment. Interestingly, Nichols reached different results with the common sense challenge experiment; in some data, he obtained deterministic results and in others, he obtained results indicating free will. In this study, according to the author, despite the articles that have been written on this topic, newer criticisms of the incompatibilist theory have.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)