A Study of the Concept of Moral Responsibility

Document Type : The Quarterly Jornal

Author

Assistant professor, Department of Moral Philosophy, Islamic Philosophy and Theology Research Center, Islamic Sciences and Culture Academy, Qom, Iran.

Abstract

The nature, scope, and conditions of moral responsibility are among the highly controversial issues in ethical studies. A significant portion of these controversies appears to arise from the ambiguity surrounding concepts like moral responsibility and free will. This research utilizes the descriptive-analytic method to analyze the concept of moral responsibility. The diverse semantic scope of the concept of moral responsibility prompts the following question: What notion of moral responsibility has led to so many disputes between compatibilists and incompatibilists? Have we not encountered the challenge where one party argues for the compatibility of causal necessity with responsibility based on the agent’s role and duty, while the other attempts to demonstrate the inconsistency and conflict between any causal predetermination and responsibility as accountability? While the initial focus of moral philosophers on issues of moral responsibility sometimes centers on three types of responsibility related to causation, duty, and moral requirement, recent works highlight two notions of responsibility concerning blameworthiness and accountability. It appears that the most precise concept of human moral responsibility towards moral requirements is "accountability."

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

Aristotle. (1378 AP). Nichomachean Ethics (1st ed., M. H. Lotfi, trans.). Tehran: Tarh-e Now. [In Persian]
Bok, H. (1998). Freedom and Responsibility. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Dimock, S. (2011). Please Drink Responsibly: Can the Responsibility of Intoxicated Offenders Be Justified by the Tracing Principle? In Nicole A. Vincent (Ed.). Moral Responsibility: Beyond Free Will and Determinism (pp. 83-99). Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.
Eshleman, A. (2001). Moral Responsibility )First published Jan 6(. Retrieved March 1, 2024 from http://plato.standford.edu/contents.htm.
Fischer, J. M. & Ravizza, M. (1998). Responsibility and Control: A Theory of Moral Responsibility. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Fischer, J. M. & Tognazzini N. A. (2011). The Physiognomy of Responsibility. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 82(2), pp. 381-417.
Hart, H. L. A. (2008). Postscript: Responsibility and Retribution. In Punishment and Responsibility: Essays in the Philosophy of Law. New York: Oxford University Press.
Oshana, M. (1997). Ascriptions of Responsibility. American Philosophical Quarterly, 34(1), pp. 71-83.
Sayyid al-Raḍī. (1373 AP). Nahj al-balāgha (6th ed., S. J. Shahidi, trans.). Tehran: Elmi Farhangi Publishing Company. [In Persian]
Scanlon T. M. (1998). What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Strawson, P. F. (1962). Freedom and Resentment. Proceedings of the British Academy, 48, pp. 187-211.
Vincent, N. A. (2011). A Structured Taxonomy of Responsibility Concepts. In Nicole A. V. (Ed.), Moral Responsibility: Beyond Free Will and Determinism. New York: Springer.
Wallace, R. J. (1998). Responsibility and the Moral Sentiments. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Watson, G. (1988). Responsibility and the Limits of Evil: Variations on a Strawsonian Theme. In Ferdinand Schoeman (Ed.), Responsibility, Character, and the Emotions: New Essays in Moral Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Watson, G. (2004). Agency and Answerability: Selected Essays. New York. Oxford University Press.
Williams, G. (2008). Responsibility as a Virtue. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 11(4), pp. 455-470.
Zimmerman, M. J. (1988). An Essay on Moral Responsibility. Totowa, N.J.: Rowman and Littlefield.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics