Examining the Applicability of the Hermeneutics of Suspicion in Understanding Quranic Verses on Women

Document Type : The Quarterly Jornal

Authors

1 PhD Candidate, Department of Religious Studies, Faculty of Religions, University of Religions and Denominations, Qom, Iran (Corresponding Author).

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Religious Studies, Faculty of Religions, University of Religions and Denominations, Qom, Iran.

3 Postdoctoral fellow in Quranic studies, Paderborn Institute for Islamic Theology, University of Paderborn – Germany

Abstract

he challenges in interpreting Quranic verses related to women—particularly concerning justice in the modern era—have long been a subject of debate among scholars and exegetes. This article explores whether the hermeneutics of suspicion can serve as a tool for resolving existing interpretive conflicts and opening new pathways for reinterpreting these verses. To examine this question, the study first reviews the application of the hermeneutics of suspicion in reinterpreting biblical passages related to women, utilizing a comparative theological approach aimed at deepening the understanding of one’s own religious tradition. Next, by analyzing the similarities and differences among various Quranic exegetical methods, the study evaluates the potential of applying the hermeneutics of suspicion to generate new interpretive solutions. The findings indicate that this approach can effectively address the challenges in interpreting Quranic verses on women and justice. By emphasizing the critique of presuppositions, the multilayered meanings of the text, the influence of power dynamics on interpretations, and its parallels with certain Islamic exegetical mechanisms—such as the principles of muhkam and mutashabih, naskh, and asbab al-nuzul—the hermeneutics of suspicion can provide a valuable framework for rethinking and developing alternative readings of Quranic verses concerning women and justice.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

* The Quran.
** The Bible.
Afsaruddin, A. (2023). Modern rereadings of the Qur’an through a gendered lens. In A. Afsaruddin (Ed.), Oxford handbook of Islam and women (pp. 80–118). Oxford University Press.
Al-Faruqi, I. R. (1962). Towards a new methodology for Qur’anic exegesis. Islamic Studies, 1(1), pp. 35–52.
Ali, K. (2006). Sexual ethics and Islam: Feminist reflections on Qur'an, Hadith, and jurisprudence. Oxford: Oneworld.
Barlas, A. (2019). Believing women in Islam: Unreading patriarchal interpretations of the Qur’an. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Bigger, S. F. (2011). Ricoeur and the hermeneutics of suspicion. Journal of Beliefs & Values, 32(1), pp. 107–108.
Bryan, C. (2014). Listening to the Bible: The art of faithful biblical interpretation. Oxford University Press.
Dube Shomanah, M. W. (2000). Postcolonial feminist interpretation of the Bible. United States of America.
Esack, F. (1997). Qurʾan, liberation & pluralism: an Islamic perspective of interreligious solidarity against oppression. Oxford: Oneworld.
Fanaei, A. (2012). Ethics of interpretation. Ketab-e mah-e din, (184), pp. 4–11. [In Persian]
Fazlur Rahman. (2018a). Islam and modernity (Z. Iranban, Trans.). Tehran: Kargadan. [In Persian]
Fazlur Rahman. (2018b). Major themes of the Qur’an (F. Alaqebandi, Trans.). Tehran: Kargadan. [In Persian]
Gadamer, H. G. (2004). Truth and method (J. Weinsheimer & D. G. Marshall, Trans.). London & New York: Continuum.
Ghaffar, Z. (2022). Kanon im Kanon? Herausforderungen einer koranischen Theologie. In K. von Stosch & C. Tietz (Eds.), Normativität heiliger Schriften in Judentum, Christentum und Islam (Vol. 87, pp. 67–91). Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
Harrison, V. S. (2007). Modern women, traditional Abrahamic religions and interpreting sacred texts. Feminist Theology, 15(2), pp. 145–159.
Hedayatullah, A. (2021). Feminist margins of the Qur'an (M. Mohasses & N. Daneshfard, Trans., 1st ed.). Tehran: Kargadan. [In Persian]
Ibn Kathīr, I. ibn 'U. (1998). Tafsīr al-Qurʾan al-ʿaẓīm (M. H. Shams al-Din, Ed., Vol. 1, 1st ed.). Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyya, Manshurat Muhammad Ali Baydun. [In Arabic]
Kianifard, N., & Lakzaei, M. (2022). Feminist analysis of Biblical interpretation using Schüssler Fiorenza’s hermeneutical model. Religious Studies Quarterly, 16(31), pp. 188–210. [In Persian]
Marifat, M. H. (1988). Al-Tamhīd fī ʿulūm al-Qurʾān (Vol. 2, 1st ed.). Qom: Managerial Center of the Seminary of Qom. [In Arabic]
Mehri Zi, M. (2014). The Qur'an and the issue of women (1st ed.). Tehran: Nashr-e Elm. [In Persian]
Ricoeur, P. (1970). Freud and philosophy: An essay on interpretation (D. Savage, Trans.). New Haven & London: Yale University Press.
Ricoeur, P. (1976). Interpretation theory: Discourse and the surplus of meaning. Texas Christian University Press.
Ricoeur, P. (1997). The conflict of interpretation (K. M. Newton, Ed.). London: Palgrave.
Schüssler Fiorenza, E. (1992). Feminist hermeneutics. In Anchor Bible dictionary (Vol. 2, pp. 783–791).
Schüssler Fiorenza, E. (1994). In memory of her. New York: Crossroad Publishing.
Schüssler Fiorenza, E. (1995). Bread not stone. Boston: Beacon Press.
Schüssler Fiorenza, E. (1998). Sharing her word. Boston: Beacon Press.
Schüssler Fiorenza, E. (1999). Rhetoric and ethic: The politics of biblical studies. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.
Schüssler Fiorenza, E. (2013). Changing horizons. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.
Shafiei, S., Eslami, A., Eqbal, E., & Abayi, M. (2019). Literary-historical approaches to feminist interpretation of the Bible and the Qur'an. Religious Studies, 7(13), pp. 29–48. [In Persian]
Scott-Baumann, A. (2009). Ricoeur and the Hermeneutics of Suspicion. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Stosch, K. van. (2011). Comparative theology as challenge for the theology of the 21st century. Religious Inquiries, 1, pp. 5–26.
Tofiqi, F. (2017). Hermeneutics of suspicion. Zanan-e Emruz Monthly, (27), 106. [In Persian]
Tofiqi, F. (2022). Modern methods of interpreting sacred texts (1st ed.). Tehran: Kargadan. [In Persian]
Wadud, A. (2021). Qur'an and woman (A. Pouya, Trans., 4th ed.). Tehran: Hikmat Publications. [In Persian]

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics