An Analysis of Mahmoud Ayoub’s Theory of Redemptive Suffering in Islam

Document Type : The Quarterly Jornal

Authors

1 PhD student, Islamic Theology, Department of Philosophy and Theology, Shahid Motahari University, Tehran, Iran. Email: mahdi.moravveji@gmail.com

2 Associate professor, Pontifical Institute for Arabic and Islamic Studies (PISAI), Rome, Italy.

3 Associate professor, Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Deploying the analytical method, this article addresses Mahmoud Ayoub’s theory of redemptive suffering in Islam. This theory was inspired by the Christian doctrine of redemptive suffering, wherein Jesus Christ’s passions are considered an atonement for the deliverance and salvation of humanity, liberating them from slavery to sins. Considering that Imam al-Husayn’s suffering and martyrdom in Karbala granted him the right to intercession, through which he can deliver people from the fires of hell, Ayoub presents a model for redemption and salvation based on Islamic doctrines and Imami Shiite theology. This article provides a critical examination of Ayoub’s model. Finally, by assessing the possibility and potentiality of the concept of redemption in Shiite theology, the article aims to pave another path for research on its full compatibility with the theological principles of Imami Shiism.

Keywords

Main Subjects


* The Holy Quran.
The New Testament: John, Matthew, Mark, Luke, Acts of Epistles, Paul’s Epistles (Epistle to the Romans, Epistle to the Hebrews, Epistle to the Colossians, Epistle to the Ephesians), Book of Revelation.
The Old Testament: Book of Genesis, The Book of Psalms.
Ayoub, M. (1978). Redemptive Suffering in Islam: A Study of the Devotional Aspects of in Twelver Shī‘īsm. The Hague in the Netherlands: Mouton Publishers.
Ayoub, M. (2007). A Muslim View of Christianity: Essays on Dialogue )Irfan A. Omar, Ed.). New York: Orbis Books.
Ḥusaynī al-Mūsawī, M. (1418 AH). Tasliyat al-mujālis wa-zīnat al-majālis (story of al-Husayn’s murder) (Vol. 2). Qom: Muʾassasat al-Maʿarif al-Islamiyya. [In Arabic]
Ibn Abī l-Ḥadīd, A. (1967). Sharḥ nahj al-balāgha (M.A. Ibrahim, Ed., Vol. 13). Beirut: Dar Ihyaʾ al-Turath al-ʿArabi. [In Arabic]
Johannes. G & Ringgren, H. (1975). Theological Dictionary of the Old Testament. USA: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Co.
Kulaynī, M. (2007). Uṣūl al-kāfī (Vols. 2 & 3). Beirut: Manshurat al-Fajr. [In Arabic]
Majlisī, M.B. (1983). Biḥār al-anwār. Beirut: al-Wafa Institute. [In Arabic]
Ma'luf, L. (1371 AP). Al-Munjid fī l-lugha wa-l-aʿlām. Qom: Esmaeilian. [In Arabic]
Moltmann, J. (2002). Theology of Hope: On the Ground and the Implications of a Christian Eschatology. London: SCM Press.
Moravveji Qazvini, A. (1397 AH). Dirāsātunā min al-fiqh al-Jaʿfarī (Vol. 3). Qom: Mehr Publications.
Moravveji, M. (2022). The Intercessory Role of the Prophet and the Holy Family through the Concept of the hawd al-kawthar: A Critical study of Mahmoud Ayoub’s Thoughts. Turkish Journal of Shiite Studies, 4, pp. 33-49.
Muttaqī al-Hindī, A. (1981). Kanz al-ʿummāl (Vol. 12). Beirut: al-Risala Institute. [In Arabic]
Rāghib al-Iṣfahānī, H. (2012). Al-Mufradāt fī gharīb al-Qurʾān. Beirut: Dar al-Maʿruf. [In Arabic]
VandenBerg, M. (2007). Redemptive Suffering: Christ’s Alone. Scottish Journal of Theology, 60(4), pp. 394–411.