A Critical Consideration of Hume’s View of the Origin and Content of the Belief in Human Soul/Spirit

Document Type : The Quarterly Jornal

Authors

1 PhD student of Islamic philosophy, Baqir al-‘Ulum University, Qom, Iran

2 Associate professor, Baqir al-‘Ulum University, Qom, Iran

Abstract

David Hume, an empiricist philosopher, accounts for the contents of conceptions and beliefs by observing their origins; since he thinks that according to the copy principle a conception or belief with a vague origin—one that cannot be traced back to a specific impression—has no specific content and will thus be absurd. Hume adopts the same approach in his account of the origin and content of the belief in the human soul or self or spirit, concluding that the belief in souls is neither rational, nor intuitive (the negative view)—indeed, it is originated in imaginations and is, therefore, erroneous and yet unavoidable (the positive view). In this paper, we will draw on the descriptive-analytic method to consider and criticize Hume’s account of this and show that, on the one hand, his positive view is not satisfactory, involving a number of epistemic gaps, and on the other, he has ignored the role of knowledge by presence in his account of the belief in the soul.

Keywords

References

1. Bailey, A. & O'Brien, D. (2006). Hume’s Enquiry concerning Human Under-standing. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.
2. Broughton, J. (2006). Impressions and Ideas. The Blackwell Guide to Hume’s Treatise (S. Traiger, Ed.). Blackwell Publishing.
3. Fanaei Eshkevari, M. (1388 AP). Knowledge by presence. Qom: Imam Kho-meini (Ra) Educational and Research Institute. [In Persian].
4. Farabi. (1413 AH). Philosophical actions. Beirut: Dar al-Manahil. [In Arabic].
5. Fayazi, G. (1387 AP). An Introduction to Epistemology. Qom: Imam Kho-meini (Ra) Educational and Research Institute. [In Persian].
6. Fayazi, G. (1389 AP). Philosophical psychology (M. T. Yousefi, Ed.). Qom: Imam Khomeini (Ra) Educational and Research Institute. [In Persian].
7. Garrett, D. (2005). Hume, the shorter Routledge encyclopedia of philosophy (E. Craig, Ed.). Routledge.
8. Gaskin, J. C. A. (1974). God, Hume and Natural Belief. Philosophy, 49(189), pp. 281-294.
9. Hume, D. (2007). Enquiry concerning Human Understanding (P. Millican, Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10. Hume, David. (1965). Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11. Ibn Sina. (1404 AH). al-Ta’liqat. Beirut: Islamic Media Library. [In Arabic].
12. Jafari, M. T. (1378 AP). Review and critique of Hume's theories on four phil-osophical issues. Tabriz: University of Tabriz. [In Persian].
13. Kemp Smith, N. (2005). The Philosophy of David Hume (D. Garrett, Ed.). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
14. McCormick, M. (1993). Hume on Natural Belief and Original Principles. Hume Studies, 19(1), pp. 103-116.
15. Moallemi, H. (1386 AP). Background and plot of Islamic epistemology. Teh-ran: Institute for Islamic Culture and Thought.
16. Motahhari, M. (1389 AP). Collection of works (Vol. 6). Tehran: Sadra. [In Persian].
17. Noonan, H. W. (1999). Hume on knowledge. Abingdon: Routledge.
18. Oboudiat, A. (1387 AP). An introduction to the system of Sadra wisdom. Qom: Imam Khomeini (Ra) Educational and Research Institute. [In Persian].
19. Pitson, A. E. (2002). Hume’s Philosophy of the self. Abingdon: Routledge.
20. Suhrawardi. (1375 AP). Collection of Shaykh Ishraq's works. Tehran: Insti-tute of Cultural Studies and Research. [In Arabic].
21. Swain, C. G. (2006). Personal Identity and the Skeptical System of Philoso-phy. The Blackwell Guide to Hume’s Treatise (S. Traiger, Ed.). New Jersey: Blackwell Publishing.
22. Yazdan Panah, Y. (1391 AP). The Wisdom of Illumination (M. Alipour, Ed., Vol. 2). Tehran: Samt. [In Persian].

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics