A Comparative Study of Exemplarism in Christianity and Islam, Zegzebski’s View and Authoritavist Ethics

Document Type : The Quarterly Jornal

Author

Assistant professor, Department of Theoretical Ethics, Islamic Psychology and Ethics Research Center, Research Institute of the Quran and Hadith, Qom, Iran.

Abstract

Exemplarism is a form of virtue ethics that posits moral exemplars as fundamental criteria of morality. Currently, two distinct versions of exemplarism have been articulated: one rooted in the Christian tradition and another in the Islamic-Shiite tradition. The Christian perspective, as expounded by Zagzebski, draws inspiration from the character of Jesus Christ. On the other hand, the theory of authoritavist (wilāʾī) ethics, derived from the transmitted teachings of Shiism, shares notable similarities with Zagzebski’s theory. In the Christian tradition, exemplars are developed based on the writings of Zagzebski, guided by Christian principles and the character of Jesus Christ. In contrast, Shiite exemplarism holds that perfect exemplars are infallible, immune from sins and mistakes. Accordingly, their speeches and actions serve as criteria for understanding moral concepts and instances. This article aims to clarify and compare these two perspectives, highlighting the advantages of authorativist ethics over Christian exemplarism. It emphasizes the concept of infallibility (ʿiṣma) of the exemplar and explores how this belief addresses objections raised against exemplarism. Drawing upon a library and analytical comparative method, this article contends that the belief in the infallibility of exemplars addresses objections such as the unreliability of all actions and characteristics of the exemplar, moral immaturity, and relativism. The acceptance of the infallibility of the perfect exemplar stands out as a distinctive advantage of Shiite exemplarism over its Christian counterpart.

Keywords

Main Subjects


* The Holy Quran.
** Nahj al-balagha.
Aristotle. (1389 AP). Nicomachean Ethics (M. H. Lotfi Tabrizi, trans., 3rd ed.). Tehran: Tarh-e Now. [In Persian]
Driver, J. (2013). Virtue Ethics. In H. LaFollette (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Ethics (pp. 5356-5367). Wiley-Blackwell.
Farāhīdī, K. (1409 AH). Kitāb al-ʿayn (2nd ed.). Qom: Hejrat Publications. [In Arabic]
Fayḍ al-Kāshānī, M. (1412 AH). Al-Wāfī. Isfahan: Imam Amir al-Muʾminin Library. [In Arabic]
Hume, D. (1392 AP). An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals (1st ed., M. Mardiha, trans.). Tehran: Minooye Kherad. [In Persian]
Ibn al-Fāris, A. (1990). Maqāyīs al-lugha. Beirut: Dar al-Islamiyya. [In Arabic]
Ibn Bābawayh, M. (1361 AP). Maʿānī l-akhbār (Ali Akbar Ghaffari, ed.). Qom: Islamic Publishing Institute. [In Arabic]
Ibn Bābawayh, M. (1378 AH). ʿUyūn akhbār al-Riḍā ʿalayh al-salām (1st ed., Vol. 2). Tehran: Jahan Publications. [In Arabic]
Ibn Shuʿba al-Ḥarrānī, Ḥ. (1404 AH/1363 AP). Tuḥaf al-ʿuqūl (1st ed.). Qom: Noor Software. [In Arabic]
Khazzāz al-Rāzī, A. (1401 AH). Kifāyat al-athar fī l-naṣṣ ʿalā l-aʾimmat al-ithnā ʿashar (H. Kouhkamarei, ed.). Qom: Bidar. [In Arabic]
Kulaynī, M. (1369 AP). Uṣūl al-kāfī (1st ed., S. J. Mostafavi, trans.). Tehran: Elmiyieh Eslamiyeh Bookstore. [In Arabic]
Kulaynī, M. (1381 AP). Bihisht-i kāfī, tarjumih-yi rawḍa kāfī (H. R. Azhir, trans.). Qom: Sorour. [In Persian]
Kulaynī, M. (1407 AH). Al-Kāfī (4th ed., Vols. 1, 2, 6). Tehran: al-Islamiyya. [In Arabic]
Majlisī, M. B. (1403 AH). Biḥār al-anwār (2nd ed.). Beirut: Noor Software. [In Arabic] 
Mir Sane, S. M. B., & Sadeghi, H. (1398 AP). Wilayee Ethics; Virtueism based on Shiite teachings. Proceedings of the International Conference on the Second Stage of Iranian Revolution. Tehran: Imam Hossein University, pp. 207-234. [In Persian]
Mufīd, M. (1413 AH). Al-Fuṣūl al-mukhtāra (A. Mirsharifi, ed.). Qom: Shaykh Mufid Congress. [In Arabic]
Nūrī Ṭabarsī, H. (1408 AH). Mustadrak al-wasāʾil wa-mustanbaṭ al-masāʾil (1st ed., Vol. 11). Qom: Al al-Bayt Institute. [In Arabic]
Pincoffs, E. (1382 AP). Quandaries and virtues: against reductivism in ethics (S.H. Hassani and M. Alipour, trans.). Qom: Daftar-e Nashr-e Maaref. [In Persian]
Sadeghi, H. (1399 AP). Philosophy of ethics in the framework of reason and religion (1st ed.). Qom: Taha. [In Persian]
Sadeghi, H., & Mir Sane, S. M. B. (In press). Virtue ethics; In the mirror of reason and narration. Qom: Research Institute for Qur'an and Hadith. [In Persian]
Shahriari, S. & Navvab, M. H. (1394 AP). Zagzebski’s moral theory: exemplarist virtue theory. Philosophy 43(1), pp. 41-58. [In Persian]
Slote, M. (2001). Morals from motives. New York: Oxford University Press.
Swanton, C. (2003). Virtue Ethics: A Pluralistic View. New York: Oxford University Press.
Timmons, M. (2013). Moral Theory: An Introduction (2nd ed.). Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
Ṭūsī, M. (1411 AH). Miṣbāḥ al-mutahajjid (A. A. Morvarid, ed.). Beirut: Institute for Shiite Jurisprudence. [In Arabic]
Ṭūsī, M. (1414 AH). Al-Amālī (1st ed.). Qom: Dar al-Thiqafa. [In Arabic]
Ṭūsī, N. (1377 AP). Akhlāq muḥtashamī (1st ed.). Tehran: University of Tehran. [In Arabic]
Yousefian, H. & Sharifi, A. H. (1388 AP). A study of the infallibility of the Infallible (2nd ed.). Qom: Publications of Research Institute of Islamic Culture and Thought. [In Persian]
Zagzebski, L. (2004). Divine Motivation Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zagzebski, L. (2009). The Virtues of God and the Foundations of Ethics. In D. Miller Timothy & L. Zagzebski, (Eds.), Readings in philosophy of religion. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
Zagzebski, L. (2012). Epistemic Authority: A Theory of Trust, Authority, and Autonomy in Belief. New York: Oxford University Press.
Zagzebski, L. T. (1401 AP). Exemplarist Moral Theory (A. H. Khodaparast, trans., 1st ed.). Tehran: Kargadan. [In Persian]