A Critique of William Rowe’s View of John Hick’s Theodicy

Document Type : The Quarterly Jornal

Authors

1 University of Qom

2 Department of Islamic Philosophy and Theology, Faculty of Theology and Islamic Studies, University of Qom, Qom, Iran

Abstract

One of the most influential versions of the evidential argument from evil was put forth by contemporary American philosopher William Rowe. He believes that frequency of evils and certain particular instances of evil in the world provide a rational context of evidence against theism. In contrast, critics try to uncover flaws in his argument. Rowe dismisses many of these critiques as apologetic and ineffective, believing that theodicies such as John Hick’s “cultivation of the soul” fail to justify why arbitrary evils occur. In this study, we seek an answer for the following question: are William Rowe’s critiques of John Hick’s theodicy rational enough? To see this, we provide a rough account of the evidential argument from evil and John Hick’s theodicy, and finally show that while Hick’s theodicy fails to establish some of its grounds such as the belief in resurrection and is founded upon principles such as reincarnation, Rowe’s critiques do not undermine the ability of this theodicy to justify arbitrary evils.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

1.    Feinberg, J. S. (2004). Many Faces of Evil: Theological Systems and the Problems of Evil. Wheaton, IL: Crossway Books.
2.    Hick, J. (1376 AP). Philosophy of Religion. (B. Saleki, Trans.). Tehran: Al-Huda International Publication.
3.    Hick, J. (2007a). Evil and the God of Love. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
4.    Hick, J. (2007b). D. Z Philips on God and Evil. Religious Studies 43.
5.    Hick, John. (1994). God and the Universe of Faiths. Oneworld Publication.
6.    Khalili Nooshabadi, A. (1395 AP). God of love and the problem of evil. Qom: Taha Book.
7.    Peterson M.; VanArragon L.; Raymond J. (2004). Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Religion. Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
8.    Peterson, M. et al. (1389 AP). Reason and religious belief. (A. Naraghi and E. Soltani, Trans.). Tehran: Tarh-e Now Publication. [In Persian]
9.    Peterson, M. L. (1998). God and Evil: An Introduction to the Issues. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
10.    Plantinga, A. (1376 AP). God, Freedom, and Evil. (M. Saeedimehr, Trans.). Qom: Taha Cultural Institute. [In Persian]
11.    Rostami, Y. (1399 AP). David Griffin’s critique of John Hick’s view of the problem of evil. Comparative theology, 11(23), pp. 47-60. [In Persian]
12.    Rowe, W. L. (1988). Evil and Theodicy. Philosophical Topics, 16(2), p. 119-132.
13.    Rowe, W. L. (2007). Philosophy of Religion: An Introduction. (Fourth Ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth.
14.    Rowe, William L. (1979). The Problem of Evil and Some Varieties of Atheism. American Philosophical Quarterly, 16(4), pp. 335-341.
15.    Russell, B. (1989). The Persistent Problem of Evil. Faith and Philosophy. 6(2), pp. 121-139.
16.    Taliaferro, C. (1382 AP). Philosophy of Religion in the Twentieth Century. (E. Rahmati, Ed.). Tehran: Suhrawardi Office of Research and Publication. [In Persian]
17.    Trakakis, N. (2007). The God Beyond Belief: In Defence of William Rowe’s Evidential Argument from Evil. Dordrecht: Springer.
18.    Van Inwagen, P. (1996). Reflections on the Chapters by Draper, Russell, and Gale. The Evidential Argument from Evil. (D. Howard-Snyder, Ed.). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics