A Consideration of the Approach of “Epistemology of Religious Disagreements” in Comparative Theology*

Document Type : The Quarterly Jornal

Authors

1 faculty of theology, ferdowsi university

2 Assistant professor, College of Theology, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran

3 Associate professor, College of Theology, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran

Abstract

The encounter with religious plurality and diversity, which is a main characteristic of life in the contemporary world, has posed a number of epistemological and theological problems. Awareness of religious diversity and religious disagreements presents challenges to the discharge of epistemic duties by the religious person. In epistemology of disagreements, as a branch of epistemology, an individual’s epistemic duties in the face of disagreements are specified, and various approaches have been adopted from quite conciliatory views to steadfast views. Comparative theology takes up a religious approach to respond to the challenge of religious plurality and diverse theological approaches in the face of such plurality in order to arrive at a deeper understanding of religious faith. In this article, we deploy the descriptive-analytic method to find an epistemic solution based on the epistemology of religious disagreements with which this newly emerged theology can attain its goals. We conclude that by adopting an intermediary approach between steadfast and conciliatory views and drawing on the graded nature of religious beliefs and rejection of the idea of epistemic peers, we can propose a normative approach to comparative theology so that it does not fall into suspension of beliefs, relativism, skepticism, or religious conversion.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

1.    Akbarzadeh, M. (1390 AP). The effect of non-epistemic factors on the process of acquiring knowledge. Philosophical-Theological Research, 12(4), 59–67. https://doi.org/10.22091/pfk.2011.123. [In Persian]
2.    Basinger, D. (2020). Is it Reasonable to Believe That Only One Religion is True? In contemprory debates in philosophy of religion (2nd ed., p. 400). Oxford: Wiley Blackweel.
3.    Catherine Z. E. (2010). Persistent Disagreement. Oxford University Press. From: https://oxford.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199226078.001.0001/acprof-9780199226078-chapter-4.
4.    Choo, F. (2018). The Epistemic Significance of Religious Disagreements: Cases of Unconfirmed Superiority Disagreements. Topoi. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-018-9599-4.
5.    Christensen, D, P., & & Lackey, J. (Eds.). (2013). The epistemology of disagreement: new essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6.    Christensen, D. (2007). Epistemology of Disagreement: The Good News. Philosophical Review, 116(2), pp. 187–217. https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-2006-035.
7.    Christensen, D. (2009). “Disagreement as Evidence: The Epistemology of Controversy,” Philosophy Compass 4, no. 5 p. 758.
8.    Clooney, Francis X. (2010). Comparative Theology: Deep Learning Across Religious Borders. Wiley-Blackwell.
9.    Clooney, F. (1390 AP). An Introduction to Comparative Theology. (Shojaei Joshaghani, M, Trans.), Book of the Month of Religion, 170 (1), pp. 43–49. [In Persian]
10.    Cornille, C. (2008). The Im-Possibility of Interreligious Dialogue. New York: Herder & Herder.
11.    Cornille, C. (2020). Meaning and method in comparative theology (1st ed.). Hoboken: Wiley.
12.    DePoe J. (2011). The significance of religious disagreement. In: Evans J, Heimbach D (Eds.). Taking Christian moral thought seriously: the legitimacy of religious beliefs in the marketplace of ideas. B & H Academic, Nashville,. In Taking christian moral thought seriously: the legitimacy of religious beliefs in the marketplace of ideas. Nashville.
13.    Elga, A. (2007). Reflection and Disagreement. Nous, 41(3), pp. 478–502. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0068.2007.00656.x
14.    Faramarz Gharamaleki, A., & Naskhian, A. A. (1396 AP). The power of imagination. Qom: Majnoon Publications. [In Persian]
15.    Frances, B. Disagreement. Polity, Cambridge, 2014.
16.    Hojjati, Q. (1397 AP). A conciliatory approach to the challenge of religious dissent. Journal of Philosophy of Religion (Letter of Wisdom), 16(1), pp. 19–40. [In Persian]
17.    Hojjati, Q. (1398 AP). Religious differences (epistemological study). Tehran: Taha. [In Persian]
18.    Pittard, J. (2021). Disagreement, Religious. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. From: https://iep.utm.edu/rel-disa/
19.    Karimzadeh, O. (1394 AP). Epistemology of disagreement and higher-order evidence. Journal of Naqd va Nazar, 20(3), pp. 81–108. [In Persian]
20.    Kelly, T. (2019). The Epistemic Significance of Disagreement. In Contemporary Epistemology (pp. 249–264). John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119420828.ch17.
21.    Kraft, J. (2012). The Epistemology of Religious Disagreement: A Better Understanding (2012th ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.
22.    Molavi, A., & Movahedi, M. R. (1396 AP). The effect of non-epistemic factors on knowledge in the mirror of Rumi's spiritual Masnavi. Journal of Philosophical Theological Research, 19. [In Persian]
23.    Moyaert, M. (2017). Comparative Theology: Between Text and Rite. The Past, Present and Future of Theologies of Interreligious Dialogue, pp. 184–200.
24.    Moyaert, M. (2014). In Response to the Religious Other: Ricoeur and the Fragility of Interreligious Encounters. Lanham, Maryland: Lexington Books.
25.    Moyaert, M. (2015). Theology Today: Comparative Theology as a Catholic Theological Approach. Theological Studies, 76(1), pp. 43–64. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0040563914565298.
26.    Patterson, M., & Hasker, W. (1388 AP). Reason and religious belief. (Naraghi, A., & Soltani, E. Trans.). Tehran: Tarhe No. [In Persian]
27.    Pittard J. (2014). Conciliationism and religious disagreement. In Challenges to moral and religious belief: disagreement and evolution. Oxford University Press.
28.    Poorsina, Z. (1382 AP). The effect of sin on knowledge in the confessions of St. Augustine. Journal of Naqd va Nazar, 8 (30-29), pp. 429–451. [In Persian]
29.    Qorbani, Q. (1393 AP). The skeptical rationality of the system of religious beliefs. Journal of Theological Belief Research, 4(14), pp. 103–128. [In Persian]
30.    Sadegh Nia, M. (1397 AP). Comparative theology: an attempt to develop an understanding of the scriptures. Comparative Studies of the Holy Quran and Holy Texts, pp. 31–48. [In Persian]
Naqd Va Nazar
Volume 27, Issue 106 - Serial Number 106
Special edition of the 100th anniversary of the establishment of Qom seminary
July 2022
Pages 165-195

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics