A Comparative Consideration of Argument for God’s Existence from Consciousness: Swinburne and Mullā Ṣadrā

Document Type : The Quarterly Jornal

Author

philosophy

Abstract

There is an argument for God’s existence from consciousness. The argument was initially formulated by Swinburne in contemporary Western philosophy. He claims that no one has preceded him in formulating the argument, except John Locke who had a vague reference to it. The argument considers the existence of mental phenomena, such as feelings, emotions, intentions, and thoughts—which are scientifically unexplainable and merely admit of subjective explanations—as evidence for God’s existence. Swinburne provides an inductive versions of the argument, which confirms and reinforces the probability of God’s existence. A survey of arguments for God’s existence in Islamic philosophical tradition reveals that Mullā Ṣadra was the first philosopher who argued for God’s existence from rational consciousness. His argument is syllogistic and certainty-conferring. This paper deploys a descriptive-analytic method to consider the two versions of the argument from consciousness for God’s existence in Western and Islamic philosophical traditions, comparing their agreements, distinctions, weaknesses, and strengths.

Keywords

References

1. Al-Razi, F. (2008). Al-Mabahith al-Mashriqiyya. Qom: Dhu al-Qarbi. [In Arabic]
2. Farabi, Abu Nasr. (1926). Risala fi Ithbat al-Mufaraqat. Hyderabad: Mataba‘a Majlis Da’irat al-Ma‘arif al-‘Uthmaniyya. [In Arabic]
3. Ibn Sina, Husayn ibn ‘Abd Allah. (1980). ‘Uyun al-Hikma (A. R. Badawi, Ed.). Beirut: Dar al-Qalam. Second Edition. [In Arabic]
4. Ibn Sina, Husayn ibn ‘Abd Allah. (1996). Al-Nafs min Kitab al-Shifa’ (The Soul from the Book of Healing). Edited by Hasanzadih Amuli. Qom: Islamic Propagation Office. [In Arabic]
5. Ibn Sina, H. (2000). Al-Nijat (M. T. Danishpazhuh, Ed.). Tehran: University of Tehran. Second edition. [In Arabic]
6. Ibn Sina, H. (2008). Al-Isharat wa-l-Tanbihat (M. Zari‘I, Ed.). Qom: Bustan-i Kitab. Second edition. [In Arabic]
7. Locke, J. (2001). Jastari dar Fahm-i Bashar (R. Shafaq, Trans.). Tehran: Shafi‘i Publications. [In Arabic]
8. Mackie, J. L (1982). The Miracle of Theism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Moreland, G. P. (2012). Argument from Consciousness (S. Afrugh, Trans.). Haft Asiman, (53). [In Persian]
10. Okasha, S. (1999). Philosophy of Science (1st ed.). Tehran: Farhang.
11. Sabzawari, H. (2001). Sharh al-Manzuma (H. Hasanzadih Amuli & M. Talibi, Ed., Vol. 3). Qom: Nab Publications. [In Arabic]
12. Sadr al-Muta’allihin al-Shirazi, M. (2007a). Al-Mabda’ wa-l-Ma‘ad (M. Zabihi, J. Shahnazari & S. M. Khamenei, Eds., Vol. 2). Beirut: Mu’assisat al-Tarikh al-‘Arabi. [In Arabic]
13. Sadr al-Muta’allihin al-Shirazi, M. (2007b). Mafatih al-Ghayb (N. Habibi & S. M. Khamenei, Eds., Vol. 1). Tehran: Sadra Foundation of Islamic Wisdom. [In Arabic]
14. Sadr al-Muta’allihin al-Shirazi, M. (2012). Al-Shawahid al-Rububiyya (S. M. Muhaqqiq Damad & S. M. Khamenei, Eds.) Tehran: Sadra Foundation of Islamic Wisdom. Second edition. [In Arabic]
15. Sadr al-Muta’allihin al-Shirazi, M. (n.d.). Al-Hikmat al-Muta‘aliya fi-l-Asfar al-‘Aqliyya (Vol. 8). Beirut: Dar revival. [In Arabic]
16. Swinburne, R. (2018). Vujud-i Khuda (M. J Asghari, Trans.). Qom: Logos. [In Persian]
 
 

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics