A Consideration of William Alston’s View of Mystical Perception and Its Critique in terms of the Views of Husserl and Merleau-Ponty

Document Type : The Quarterly Jornal

Authors

1 PhD student of Literature and Human Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.

2 Assistant professor, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran.

Abstract

In this paper, we analyze William Alston’s model of “mystical perception” in terms of the phenomenology of Edmund Husserl and Maurice Merleau-Ponty. In his theory of “mystical perception,” Alston believes that there is a fundamental commonality between sense perception and mystical perception. With a phenomenological analysis of sense perception, he identifies the most central feature of sense perception as the “givenness” of its objects to consciousness. In fact, he characterizes perception as “direct and immediate presence of objects” or “presentation,” and characterizes mystical perception as “direct experiential consciousness of God based on one’s own conception.” To the contrary, Husserl and Merleau-Ponty rely on concepts such as “intentionality,” “phenomenological body,” and “spatiality and motion” to show that perceptual objects are never fully “given” to consciousness, because perception is never separable from body, motion, and spatiality. In Husserl’s view, perception is something “dynamic” and is in contrast to Alston’s idea that perception is “static.” Thus, what Alston refers to as mystical perception is, according to phenomenologists such as Husserl and Merleau-Ponty, void of basic properties of perception. Therefore, God’s presence to the mystic is a “personal presence.” It is like the presence of “other” and “self-consciousness” for the person.

Keywords

References

  1. Ebrahimi, Parichehr (1368), Phenomenology, Tehran: Dabir Publications
  2. Spielberg, Herbert (1392), Phenomenological Movement, a Historical Introduction (two volumes), translated by Masoud Olya, Tehran: Minoo-ye Kherad
  3. Pietersma, Henry (1398), The Problem of Knowledge and Phenomenology: Husserl, Heidegger, Merleau-Ponty, translated by Farzad Jaberolansar, Tehran: Kargadan Publications
  4. Jomadi, Siavosh (1385), An Inquiry into Life and Thoughts of Husserl and Heidegger, Tehran: Qoqnoos Publications
  5. Jean Wahl, et al (1372), Phenomenology and Existential Philosophies, translated by Yahya Mahdavi, Tehran: Khwarazmi Publications
  6. Mawlawī, Jalāluddīn Muḥammad (1378), Mathnavi Ma’navi, Reynold Nicholson, edited by Kazem Dezfoulian, Tehran: Talayeh Publications
  7. Husserl, Edmund (1372), Ideas of Phenomenology, translated by Abdolkarim Rashidian, Tehran: Elmi va Farhangi Publications
  8. Husserl, Edmund (1395), Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology, translated by Abdolkarim Rashidian, Tehran: Ney Publications
  9. Alston, William (1991), Perceiving God: The Epistemology of Religious Experience, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  10. Husserl, Edmund (1931), Ideas: General Introduction to Pure, Phenomenology, translated by W. R. Boyce Gibson, London: George, Allen And Unwin Ltd.
  11. Husserl, Edmund (1970), Logical Investigations, trans. J. N. Findlay, London: Routledge  and Kegan Paul.
  12. James, William (1961), The Varieties of Religious Experience, New York: Macmillan.
  13. Merleau-Ponty, Maurice (1962), Phenomenology of Perception, trans. Colin Smith, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Naqd Va Nazar
Volume 24, Issue 95 - Serial Number 95
December 2019
Pages 131-152

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics